| メール | mcleod.roderick.gn@u.tsukuba.ac.jp |
|---|
| 名前 | McLeod Gary Roderick |
|---|
| 所属（教員組織）※学生は指導教員の所属を選択 /Affiliation (Faculty/Organization) | 芸術系/Faculty of Art and Design |
|---|
| 専門分野/ Research Field | Photomedia (rephotography, visual methodologies, visual literacy) |
|---|
| 以下の項目から選んでください。 Please select from the options below. | 教員・研究員/ Faculty Member / Researcher |
|---|
| 職位 Position | Assistant Professor |
|---|
| 2－1研究へのAIの活用経験と意識（当てはまるものを選んでください）/Experience with and Perceptions of AI Utilization in Research | AIを活用して研究を実施したことがある/I have conducted research using AI. |
|---|
| 3-1 AI を活用することで推進したい（推進した）研究テーマを回答ください。（1テーマ40字程度）Please describe the research theme(s) you would like to promote (or have promoted) by utilizing AI. | The impact of AI on photomedia literacy, trust and uncertain landscape change amongst young learners. |
|---|
| 3-2 AIを活用することで解決したい（解決した）学術的課題の概要を教えてください（分野外の専門家がわかるように。1テーマ100〜300字程度）Please provide an overview of the academic challenge(s) you would like to address (or have addressed) by utilizing AI. | Use of AI in image-making can be nefarious. It can reduce difficulty of image production but it can also damage trust. Young people are already less interested in photographs. They prefer drawing and manga because it is not reality. But photography has always had a complicated relationship with realism. While AI is used freely, photography as a visual strategy for learning (not as a hobby or as art) is increasingly being policed and regulated by concerns about portrait rights and 'permission'. The future of communication in Japan will not be photographic. And photography will cease to be a democratic tool. |
|---|
| 3-3 以下内容がわかる場合は具体的に教えてください。１．研究テーマで AI が特に有効または改善ができる部分はどこ（何）でしょうか？２．AIを活用することによって、研究分野にどのようなインパクトをあたえられるでしょうか？If possible, please provide specific details on the following points: 1Which part(s) ... | AI can be used for creating test and introducing doubt. Application of AI is for brainstorming and speeding up survey research. AI models are not good at reading images. Gemini is OK but lacks knowledge that is best found in non-digitized books. The question above appears to be targeted at wanting to know how scientific fields improve. The arts can only deal with the consequences of the AI tools. The freedom to do that is being limited, or even replaced by other fields not choosing to collaborate with the arts. |
|---|
| 3-4 現時点で AI for Science チャレンジ型に応募したいと思いますか？At this point, would you like to apply for the AI for Science Challenge–type program? | 共同研究先が見つかれば応募したい I would like to apply if a suitable collaborative research partner is found. |
|---|
| 3-5 ご自身の研究活動にAIを導入・活用するときの課題があれば教えてください。支援構築の参考にします。（複数選択可）If you have any challenges or concerns regarding the introduction or use of AI in your own research activities, please let us know. | 相談できる相手がいない/AI専門研究者への伝手がない I do not have anyone to consult with / I have no connections to AI specialist researchers.;研究倫理や研究者としての倫理観等に不安がある（データ解析・2次利用・権利等その他関連事項） I have concerns about research ethics and professional ethics (e.g., data analysis, secondary use of data, intellectual property rights, and related issues).;「チャレンジ型」公募に自分の研究が合うか判断できない I cannot determine whether my research is suitable for a “challenge-based” funding program.;データ整理・前処理が大変そう Data organization and preprocessing seem difficult and time-consuming.; |
|---|
| 3-6 上記テーマのためのデータは既に取得済みですか？ Have the data for the above research theme already been collected? | 現在データはなく、これからデータを取得する予定（前向き研究）The data have not yet been collected, and we plan to collect them in the future (prospective research). |
|---|